🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.